Feature Focus: Split Weight Voting

For some organizations, especially within cooperatives or company shareholder meetings, voting power for each member or shareholder isn't always equal. Some may hold more "weight" or influence based on predefined rules (like shares owned, membership level, properties owned or proxies held). 

One such method that handles this dynamic is Split Weight Voting. This allows the vote holder to split their weights between choices on the ballot. For example, if a vote holder has 3 votes from 2 votes and receives 1 proxy on a yes no motion, they can split the vote between yes and no, ex. 2 yes and 1 no.

How Split Weight Voting Works:

Each voter has a weight, which identifies how many votes they control. For example, one voter might have a weight of 72 , while another has a weight of  1. Split Weight voting will allow voters to split their votes among the available choices based on the votes they control. Below are a couple of examples to illustrate the options: the voter experience. 

Example 1 - 1 Vacancy With a Voter Having 10 Votes

In this example, there is a ballot that allows the voter to pick one candidate, and the voter has 10 votes.

This voter can either assign all 10 votes to 1 candidate, or split them across the candidates on the ballot (for example this can be used to reflect a directed proxy, or a wife wanting to vote differently from her husband for each of the properties they own).

Example 2 - 3 Vacancies With a Voter Having 10 Votes

In this example, there is a ballot that allows the voter to pick 3 candidates as there are 3 open positions on the board, and the voter has 10 votes.  Each voter receives a total number of votes equal to their weight multiplied by the number of open positions (vacancies). The number of votes the voter has is weight x vacancy or 10 x 3 equals 30 votes. This voter can either pick 3 candidates or split the 30 votes across candidates.

It’s important to note, with questions that have more than one vacancy (for example multiple open positions on a board), voters cannot assign all their votes to a single candidate, by limiting the number of votes for each candidate to the weight they hold. For example, if a voter has 10 votes, a candidate cannot be assigned 11 votes. This allows the voter to allocate votes to all candidates while preventing the voter from stacking all their influence on one candidate, which exceeds the number of votes they actually hold per choice. 

Please note that this feature is only available for Plurality votes.

This voting style balances the need for weighted influence (important in shareholder or delegate-based environments) with fairness in distribution. It encourages voters to spread their preferences while still honoring the weight of their vote. It's particularly useful in multi-seat elections where strategic diversity is desired.

As well, this voting style works well for directed proxies. This means that one voter who holds multiple votes, can vote differently. For example, on multi-vacancy votes if they hold 10 votes, and 9 are proxies, this voting method allows the proxy holder to select different options based on the proxy givers preferences. This happens while ensuring the proxy holder can’t place all votes towards one option only.

This also addresses the issues with cumulative voting, where votes can be stacked or exceed the number of choices, which is especially important in multi-vacancy votes where a voter is voting on multiple open positions. 

Next Steps

Try it out by creating a free account. Or, if you have questions, reach out by using the Buddy chat window in the bottom right-hand corner, or email support@electionbuddy.com. We are here to help!