Online voting has been revolutionary for many elections, increasing participation and security, reducing administrative workloads, and speeding up tabulation. However, voters in online elections can still be influenced both intentionally and unintentionally.
Quality online voting systems help administrators make sure they’re doing everything they can to prevent bias in their elections, but it’s important to understand where the risks of this bias lie. Avoiding online voting bias requires an intersection of neutral communication, equal voter access, and careful ballot design.
Many people are familiar with direct election influence where voters are pressured to vote a certain way. Bias can also be unintentional, however. In these cases, it’s introduced through an accumulation of small design choices.
Bias can be introduced during online elections through:
Bias can be introduced before online elections when:
These small factors can add up to having serious impacts on outcomes. Every adjustment administrators can make to avoid them helps prevent bias and secure a representative election.
|
Source of Bias |
How It Appears |
How to Avoid It |
|
Ballot Order |
Candidates or options listed in a way that favors visibility |
Use neutral ordering (e.g., alphabetical or randomized). |
|
Ballot Language |
Uneven or leading descriptions of candidates or measures |
Keep wording consistent, neutral, and equal in length. |
|
Instructions Clarity |
Confusing or unclear voting directions |
Provide comprehensible simple, clear, and standardized instructions. |
|
Unequal Communication |
Some voters receive more information or reminders than others |
Ensure consistent messaging across the entire voter base. |
|
Access to Voting |
Differences in device access or internet availability |
Optimize for mobile/desktop and offer alternative voting methods if needed. |
|
Pre-Election Exposure |
Unequal visibility of candidates or issues before voting |
Provide balanced, centralized information to all voters. |
One of the benefits of online voting is increased access, but administrators need to make sure this access is granted equally across members.
Questions administrators should ask include:
Introducing electronic voting can expand voter participation, but it can also introduce hurdles to some voters. Administrators need to be careful to make sure this doesn’t create a bias for or against part of their member base.
The nature of ballot design might not have occurred to election administrators or leaders of member-based organizations as something important, but it is. Ballots must be consistent and neutral so that they don’t subtly influence voters in their decisions or give unfair advantage to certain outcomes.
Neutral ballots must:
When evaluating online voting vendor options, organizations should make sure to take ballot design and presentation into consideration and provide neutral design ballots.
There are many steps organizations can take to reduce bias in online voting. One of the easiest steps to take is seeking the help of experts.
ElectionBuddy provides a platform designed to assist administrators in conducting fair elections, offering tools to help distribute carefully designed, neutral ballots and tabulate results quickly. To see more of our insights into election design, check out our latest post on anonymous versus public group polls!